ReviewCells2026
Antigen-Presentation Competence in Gynecologic Cancers: Mechanisms, Evidence and Translational Priorities.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune-checkpoint biomarkers in gynecologic cancers primarily estimate antigenic potential or characterize an inhibited immune response. However, they do not establish whether malignant cells are visible to antigen-specific lymphocytes. We define antigen-presentation competence as the capacity of the tumor-immune ecosystem to generate antigenic peptides, display them through functional human leukocyte antigen molecules, prime cognate T cells through professional antigen-presenting cells, and permit recognition of malignant cells by effector lymphocytes. Recurrent defects have been reported at each step in cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers, but the evidence is not equally mature across these diseases. Cervical studies emphasize human papillomavirus-associated immune selection and antigen-processing machinery abnormalities; endometrial cancer provides relatively direct treatment-linked evidence for major histocompatibility complex class I and interferon-pathway defects; and ovarian cancer offers direct immunopeptidomic and multiregion evidence that antigen availability, presentation, and immune recognition can diverge. Taken together, the literature makes antigen-presentation competence a testable functional framework. It does not yet justify a biomarker or clinical score. Prospective work will need spatial and longitudinal measurements of tumor presentation, dendritic-cell priming, and T-cell recognition. A key test is whether these measurements improve prediction beyond mismatch repair, polymerase epsilon, programmed death-ligand 1, and tumor mutational burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.