ReviewCells2026
Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Spheroids as an Emerging Regenerative Strategy for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a progressive ischemic bone disorder that may lead to subchondral fracture, femoral-head collapse, and total hip arthroplasty. Impaired regeneration reflects persistent ischemia, endothelial dysfunction, defective angiogenesis and bone remodeling, inflammation, oxidative stress, and dysfunction of endogenous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Although MSC therapy, particularly with core decompression in precollapse ONFH, is a promising joint-preserving approach, conventional two-dimensional (2D)-expanded MSCs are limited by poor survival and retention, anoikis, disrupted cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions, and loss of potency during ex vivo expansion. Three-dimensional MSC spheroids may overcome several of these limitations by preserving intercellular and matrix interactions and enhancing resistance to ischemic stress, paracrine signaling, angiogenic activity, immunomodulation, and osteogenic competence. Hypoxia-responsive signaling, autophagy, trophic-factor secretion, and extracellular vesicle-mediated communication may promote angiogenesis-osteogenesis coupling and the restoration of the ischemic bone-vascular niche. This review summarizes the pathophysiological barriers to ONFH regeneration, current evidence and limitations of conventional MSC therapy, biological mechanisms underlying MSC-spheroid activity, and emerging strategies for therapeutic optimization. Importantly, direct evidence demonstrating the superiority of MSC spheroids over conventional MSC preparations specifically in ONFH remains limited. Future translation will require disease-specific comparative studies, standardized GMP-compatible manufacturing, validated potency assays and clinically practical delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.