ArticleCells2026
Comparative Evaluation of Freezing Protocols and Cryopreservation Media for the Preservation of Alginate Encapsulated HepaRG Cells.
Article in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable storage and distribution are important for developing ready-to-use encapsulated cell products for transplantation and bioartificial liver applications. This study evaluated the cryopreservation of alginate-encapsulated HepaRG cells using a programmable controlled-rate freezing (CRF) protocol at -0.3 °C/min or conventional passive cooling at approximately -1 °C/min. Five media were tested: four commercial xeno-free formulations, including two DMSO-containing and two DMSO-free media, and a conventional formulation containing 90% fetal bovine serum and 10% DMSO. Following thawing and a 3-day recovery period, metabolic activity, albumin secretion, ammonia and lactate clearance, and phase I and phase II biotransformation activities were assessed. Cryopreservation reduced metabolic activity relative to non-frozen controls, but key hepatic functions remained detectable. The tested CRF protocol generally yielded equal or higher functional values than conventional freezing. Medium performance varied according to the endpoint assessed. Within CRF, CryoStor CS10 produced relatively high mean PrestoBlue and albumin secretion values, whereas Cellvation produced the highest mean CYP1A1/1A2 activity. These product-specific observations do not establish a general effect of DMSO. The findings support the short-term feasibility of the tested CRF protocol for this encapsulated HepaRG model but not broader clinical or drug-testing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.