ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Diagnosis in the Internet of Medical Things: An End-to-End Survey of Connected Sensing, Distributed Intelligence, Clinical Applications, and Validation.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) can extend diagnostic observation beyond episodic encounters by connecting wearable, point-of-care, imaging, and bedside devices to artificial-intelligence services. Yet continuous measurement is not itself diagnosis: a clinically useful system must establish signal validity, map an output to a defined diagnostic role, communicate uncertainty, and demonstrate agreement with an appropriate reference standard. This survey analyzes the complete IoMT diagnostic pathway from acquisition and quality control through edge-fog-cloud computation, machine and deep learning, federated training, and clinician-governed action. It distinguishes monitoring, screening, early detection, differential diagnosis, prognosis, and decision support because these tasks require different labels, thresholds, metrics, and evidence. Evidence is synthesized across electrocardiography and cardiovascular risk, glucose and metabolic assessment, connected imaging and oncology, respiratory and infectious-disease detection, electroencephalography and seizure recognition, and decentralized point-of-care testing. The analysis shows how sensor placement, missingness, compression, latency, privacy mechanisms, and site heterogeneity can change diagnostic performance even when the model is unchanged. A diagnostic evidence framework is therefore proposed that links reference standards and patient-level data separation to sensitivity, specificity, calibration, external validation, target-device feasibility, uncertainty-based referral, and prospective workflow utility. Security, explainability, and lifecycle monitoring are treated as conditions of diagnostic reliability rather than independent features. The resulting synthesis provides a clinically centered basis for deciding which IoMT outputs may support screening or diagnosis, which remain monitoring signals, and what evidence is still required before deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.