Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42882326›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Diagnosis in the Internet of Medical Things: An End-to-End Survey of Connected Sensing, Distributed Intelligence, Clinical Applications, and Validation.

Ahlem Aziz, Seydi Kaçmaz, Azam Isam Abdulkareem Aladwani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahlem AzizElectrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Karabük University, 78050 Karabük, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0001-5806-1901
Seydi KaçmazDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gaziantep University, 27310 Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5669-760X
Azam Isam Abdulkareem AladwaniDepartment of Drone Techniques Engineering, Technical College of Mosul, Northern Technical University, Mosul 41001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-5800-7553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) can extend diagnostic observation beyond episodic encounters by connecting wearable, point-of-care, imaging, and bedside devices to artificial-intelligence services. Yet continuous measurement is not itself diagnosis: a clinically useful system must establish signal validity, map an output to a defined diagnostic role, communicate uncertainty, and demonstrate agreement with an appropriate reference standard. This survey analyzes the complete IoMT diagnostic pathway from acquisition and quality control through edge-fog-cloud computation, machine and deep learning, federated training, and clinician-governed action. It distinguishes monitoring, screening, early detection, differential diagnosis, prognosis, and decision support because these tasks require different labels, thresholds, metrics, and evidence. Evidence is synthesized across electrocardiography and cardiovascular risk, glucose and metabolic assessment, connected imaging and oncology, respiratory and infectious-disease detection, electroencephalography and seizure recognition, and decentralized point-of-care testing. The analysis shows how sensor placement, missingness, compression, latency, privacy mechanisms, and site heterogeneity can change diagnostic performance even when the model is unchanged. A diagnostic evidence framework is therefore proposed that links reference standards and patient-level data separation to sensitivity, specificity, calibration, external validation, target-device feasibility, uncertainty-based referral, and prospective workflow utility. Security, explainability, and lifecycle monitoring are treated as conditions of diagnostic reliability rather than independent features. The resulting synthesis provides a clinically centered basis for deciding which IoMT outputs may support screening or diagnosis, which remain monitoring signals, and what evidence is still required before deployment.

Indexed as

biosensorsclinical decision supportdeep learningdiagnostic artificial intelligenceedge intelligenceexternal validationfederated learningInternet of Medical Thingsmachine learningmedical diagnosispoint-of-care testing

Identifiers

PMID42882326
PMCPMC13664167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.