Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42882263›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Explainable AI in Healthcare: A Holistic View of Technical Approaches, Regulatory Frameworks, Reliable Clinical Implementation Insights and Limitations.

Guilherme Barbosa, Eduardo Carvalho, Dulce Oliveira, Ana Rita Moura, Ana Guerra, Francisca Pinheiro, Ricardo Correia, André Martins Dos Santos, Nilza Ramião, Miguel Mascarenhas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Guilherme BarbosaInstituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Campus of the Faculty of Engineering, Universidade do Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias 400, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0005-5001-5539
Eduardo CarvalhoInstituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Campus of the Faculty of Engineering, Universidade do Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias 400, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0005-0729-7008
Dulce OliveiraInstituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Campus of the Faculty of Engineering, Universidade do Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias 400, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8758-471X
Ana Rita MouraInstituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Campus of the Faculty of Engineering, Universidade do Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias 400, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Ana GuerraInstituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Campus of the Faculty of Engineering, Universidade do Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias 400, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Francisca PinheiroBioGHP, Rua da Constituição, Nº 656, 1º, Sala 117, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal.
Ricardo CorreiaBioGHP, Rua da Constituição, Nº 656, 1º, Sala 117, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0005-1237-6632
André Martins Dos SantosBioGHP, Rua da Constituição, Nº 656, 1º, Sala 117, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal.
Nilza RamiãoInstituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Campus of the Faculty of Engineering, Universidade do Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias 400, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Miguel MascarenhasFaculty of Medicine, Universidade do Porto (FMUP), Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0340-0830

Funding

by Project "Agenda I BlockChain PT. Descentralizar Portugal" under PRR - Plano de Recuperação e Resiliência under the Next GenerationEU from the European Union C644918095-00000033 | Project No. 51
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opaque deep learning models in biomedical applications pose challenges related to bias, fairness, and regulatory compliance. This paper presents a narrative review of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in healthcare, specifically medical diagnosis, based on a targeted selection guided by a narrative review of recent literature, from 2019 to 2026, conducted on Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases. Covered topics comprise model interpretability, including image-based models and multimodal models, with special focus on large language models (LLMs) as a hard-to-interpret system. The review situates XAI within key regulatory frameworks, including the European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act, highlighting how explainability supports legal requirements for transparency, auditability, and accountability. It examines widely used XAI methods such as Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), attention visualization, neurosymbolic reasoning, and others. These techniques help identify bias, detect spurious correlations, and analyze hallucinations in LLM deployment. They present an effort to, within a feasible range, minimize these events and increase confidence in the predictions provided, without dispensing with clear and proper validation within the medical classification loop. While emphasizing the benefits of XAI, the review also addresses key limitations, including limited explanation fidelity, cognitive overload, and the risk of misleading interpretations. Overall, it provides a concise synthesis of how explainability intersects with ethics, regulation, and system design to support oversight and transparency in AI healthcare. Additionally, it provides suggestions for the incorporation of technical XAI methods within current legislation and guidelines to provide a robust framework for AI model deployment.

Indexed as

biomedical ethicsdeep learningexplainable artificial intelligencelarge language modelsmodel biastransparency

Identifiers

PMID42882263
PMCPMC13664080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.