ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Stemness-Associated Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis: Hepatic Adaptation, Prognostic Relevance, and Monitoring.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical assessment, treatment, and prognostic evaluation of breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) remain clinically challenging. Hepatic involvement is often identified only after substantial intrahepatic tumor burden, radiologically evident parenchymal involvement, abnormal liver function, or symptoms attributable to hepatic impairment have developed. Standard evaluation relies on molecular subtype, tumor burden, liver function, imaging, metastatic-site biopsy, receptor reassessment, and selected genomic testing; however, these variables do not fully explain why only a subset of disseminated tumor cells survives within the hepatic microenvironment, persists after therapy, and contributes to liver-dominant recurrence. This review examines CD44/CD24 phenotypic states, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity and isoform-specific expression, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)-positive and heterogeneous circulating tumor cells, claudin-2-associated hepatic tropism, and cellular interactions within the liver metastatic niche. We discuss how stemness-associated phenotypes may aid in interpreting delayed detectability, residual-cell persistence, treatment tolerance, and hepatic recurrence, while emphasizing that no single marker is sufficient for clinical stratification. Tissue reassessment, liquid biopsy, imaging, and clinicopathological information should be interpreted as complementary layers. Further progress requires BCLM-specific prospective cohorts, standardized tissue- and blood-based assays, paired primary and metastatic samples, serial liquid biopsy, and liver-specific endpoints that link residual disease biology to clinically meaningful monitoring and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.