ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Cognitive Impairment in Asthma: Emerging Evidence, Clinical Consequences, and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma is increasingly recognised as a systemic inflammatory disease with effects extending beyond the respiratory system. Emerging evidence suggests that cognitive impairment may represent an under-recognised extrapulmonary manifestation with important implications for disease management and long-term neurological health. This narrative review critically synthesises current evidence regarding the epidemiology, clinical consequences, and potential mechanisms linking asthma with cognitive dysfunction. Observational and longitudinal studies indicate that asthma is associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment, cognitive decline, and dementia. However, substantial heterogeneity in study design, cognitive assessment, asthma phenotyping, and adjustment for confounding factors limits causal inference. Cognitive deficits predominantly involve attention, executive function, memory, and, less consistently, processing speed, potentially compromising medication adherence, inhaler technique, symptom perception, and self-management. Current evidence supports a multifactorial pathophysiological model in which chronic systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, intermittent hypoxaemia, sleep disturbance, corticosteroid exposure, and psychological comorbidity interact to promote endothelial dysfunction, blood-brain barrier disruption, microglial activation, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and impaired synaptic plasticity. These mechanisms may be particularly relevant in children with early-onset asthma, older adults, and patients with severe or poorly controlled disease, although direct mechanistic evidence remains limited. Future research should prioritise well-phenotyped longitudinal cohorts that integrate comprehensive cognitive assessment with neuroimaging, inflammatory biomarkers, and objective measures of disease control to establish temporal relationships, identify high-risk populations, and determine whether cognitive dysfunction is a modifiable component of asthma burden. Recognition of cognition as a clinically relevant outcome may ultimately improve risk stratification and support more personalised, holistic approaches to asthma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.