ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Long-Term Follow-Up After Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation in Boys Facing Gonadotoxic Therapies: Safety, Pubertal Development, Reproductive Outcomes, and Clinical Implications.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Testicular tissue cryopreservation is increasingly offered to boys facing gonadotoxic therapies. Yet, its long-term clinical significance depends not only on future fertility-restoration technologies but also on how these patients evolve. This narrative review aims to synthesizes the available follow-up literature on boys who underwent testicular tissue cryopreservation, focusing on procedural safety, testicular growth, pubertal progression, endocrine function, semen outcomes in patients reaching adulthood, and the emerging question of whether cryopreserved tissue may ultimately be needed in all cases. We will compare follow-up strategies across centers, highlight the lack of standardized endpoints, and discuss how survivorship data may refine counseling, re-consent, and future management of cryopreserved tissue. The aim is to provide a clinically oriented overview of what current longitudinal cohorts can already tell us, while identifying the key evidence gaps that still limit harmonized follow-up protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.