ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
From Active Compound to Target Epithelium: Local Delivery, Preclinical Model Validity, and Clinical Endpoint Interpretation in Topical Therapy for HPV-Associated Lower Genital Tract Disease-A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical excision increases the risk of preterm birth, while active surveillance for grade 2 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia offers no active treatment. Topical therapy for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated lower genital tract disease could address this gap, yet no agent is approved for intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix, vagina, or vulva, and a 2026 systematic review left open whether cervical treatment reduces progression. Scarcity does not explain this: 52 randomized trials have evaluated adjuvant treatment after excision, but heterogeneity in phenotype, comparator, and endpoint, and incomplete access to primary reports limit their interpretability. Three problems recur. First, the target epithelial population differs by phenotype and mechanism, yet local exposure was seldom characterized, although measurement strategies are set out here. Second, some antiviral claims rely on systems that do not reproduce the differentiation-dependent HPV life cycle. Third, endpoints are read against spontaneous regression approaching the effect sought. Randomized evidence supports imiquimod as a non-surgical option for appropriately selected women with vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; cervical conclusions depend on comparator and endpoint. We propose a conceptual eight-element sequence from clinical intention to inference, an interpretive aid, and not a validated appraisal instrument. Future studies should prespecify these elements and characterize exposure where feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.