ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Delusion of Pregnancy: An Updated Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delusion of pregnancy (DoP) is a rare psychopathological symptom characterised by the fixed, delusional conviction of being pregnant in the absence of objective evidence. The systematic review by Bera and Sarkar remains, to this day, the principal quantitative reference on the phenomenon, based on 84 cases published up to August 2014. The aim of the present work is to update this case series by including literature published between September 2014 and August 2026, and to analyse any clinical and aetiological differences that emerge relative to the original sample. Thirty-two new cases were identified from 18 publications, extracted using the same categorical grid employed in the original study and integrated with the 84 historical cases (combined sample,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.