ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Cardiac Pacemakers: From Device Optimization to Individualized Cardiac Rehabilitation.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Permanent cardiac pacing abolishes symptomatic bradycardia, yet a substantial proportion of recipients remain limited on exertion. Chronotropic incompetence is present in about half of pacemaker-wearing patients when assessed by the Wilkoff index, and the rate-responsive function intended to correct it is frequently left at the settings applied at implantation. Read across the whole cardiopulmonary exercise test rather than at peak effort, the relationship between heart rate and oxygen consumption distinguishes an inadequate sensor slope, an activity threshold set too high, a reaction time out of step with the onset of exercise, and an upper rate limit reached prematurely, each with a distinct correction. Reprogramming alters the result of the test within 24 h, so the settings should be corrected before rehabilitation begins. The objective is not the highest achievable rate but the individual ceiling above which the ventricle no longer converts frequency into output. Because heart rate is partly device-determined, training intensity should be anchored to the ventilatory threshold, to the corresponding workload and to perceived exertion, with heart rate being monitored for safety rather than used to set intensity. The aim of this review is to describe how cardiopulmonary exercise testing guides device reprogramming and training prescription in the pacemaker-wearing patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.