Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42881852›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Post-Treatment Surveillance to Detect Recurrent Disease in Esophagogastric Cancer: A Review of Current Practice and Future Perspectives.

Nicola B Raftery, Mark P Ward, Claire L Donohoe, Maeve Lowery, Jessie A Elliott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicola B RafteryDepartment of Surgery, Trinity St. James Cancer Institute, St James's Hospital, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4684-5573
Mark P WardDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin and Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, St James's Hospital, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9356-7246
Claire L DonohoeDepartment of Surgery, Trinity St. James Cancer Institute, St James's Hospital, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-2662
Maeve LoweryDepartment of Medical Oncology, Trinity St. James Cancer Institute, St James's Hospital, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.
Jessie A ElliottDepartment of Surgery, Trinity St. James Cancer Institute, St James's Hospital, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-0386

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective post-treatment surveillance in cancer is designed to drive early detection and treatment of recurrence; however, surveillance protocols following curative-intent treatment for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) remain poorly defined, with no consensus across existing guidelines. Historically, a lack of evidence regarding optimal surveillance approaches has been underpinned by limited treatment efficacy in recurrent or metastatic disease. However, recent advances in chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted approaches, as well as the management of oligometastatic disease, have transformed the therapeutic landscape, making early detection of recurrence increasingly actionable. The rising incidence of EGA in younger patients adds further urgency to understanding long-term surveillance and survivorship needs. While ongoing clinical trials seek to address this question, emerging technologies, including liquid biopsy, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and artificial intelligence (AI), promise to further advance surveillance strategies. This review explores the rationale for post-treatment surveillance in EGA and examines future technologies that will shape surveillance strategies into the future.

Indexed as

cancer recurrenceesophagogastric adenocarcinomaimagingpostoperative surveillancesurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID42881852
PMCPMC13665753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.