Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42881831›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

From Rescue Therapy to Mechanism-Based Sequencing in Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Narrative Review with an Illustrative Clinical Case.

Aleksandr Ilves, Vera Nikitin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aleksandr IlvesDepartment of Neurology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9822-5982
Vera NikitinDepartment of Neurology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.ORCID 0009-0007-6399-9068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Refractory acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR-Ab-positive gMG) is clinically heterogeneous, and evidence on how to select a therapeutic mechanism after incomplete response to a previous targeted class remains limited. This narrative review synthesizes guidelines, randomized trials, extension studies, meta-analyses, observational evidence, and emerging translational data identified through targeted searches updated to 21 June 2026, with a final bibliographic check through 10 August 2026. We examine conventional immunosuppression, rescue therapy, B-cell and B-lineage depletion, terminal complement inhibition, and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibition as interventions acting at different levels of the pathogenic cascade. We propose a framework in which prior response, nonresponse, intolerance, corticosteroid dependence, respiratory vulnerability, and rescue-therapy dependence are interpreted as mechanistic clues rather than as a fixed treatment ladder. An illustrative case of severe refractory AChR-Ab-positive gMG showed incomplete control after conventional immunosuppression, rituximab, thymectomy, and terminal complement inhibition, with reproducible but transient benefit from plasma exchange. This pattern supported a mechanistic rationale for FcRn inhibition, although overlapping treatments and single-case design preclude causal attribution. Mechanism-based sequencing should be viewed as structured decision support rather than a validated algorithm. Prospective switching studies and predictive biomarkers are needed to optimize individualized treatment sequencing.

Indexed as

acetylcholine receptor antibodiesB-cell depletioncomplement inhibitionFcRn inhibitionmyasthenia gravisnipocalimabrefractory myasthenia gravistreatment sequencing

Identifiers

PMID42881831
PMCPMC13666417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.