Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42881780›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Institutional Silence and Informal Coping: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Nurses' Experiences of Workplace Violence in Three Hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abdulaziz M Alodhailah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdulaziz M AlodhailahDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0002-1643-2599

Funding

King Saud University ORF-2026-1146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesSaudi evidence on workplace violence (WPV) against nurses is largely survey-based. This study explored how nurses in three Riyadh hospitals experienced and coped with WPV, the institutional factors shaping their responses, and the improvements they proposed.

methodsIn this qualitative descriptive study, 17 purposively recruited registered nurses from a tertiary government, a specialised government, and a private hospital took part in face-to-face semi-structured interviews (January-March 2026). Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and reported according to COREQ.

resultsThe findings describe participants' experiences and are not prevalence estimates. Four themes were constructed: (1) everyday exposure to violence and its cumulative burden; (2) coping through personal strategies and peer support; (3) institutional silence and gaps in organisational protection; and (4) balancing self-protection and therapeutic care. Participants described relying on personal and peer resources where they perceived institutional protection as insufficient. Their priorities for improvement, reported separately, centred on de-escalation training, simpler reporting, timely post-incident support, and leadership accountability.

conclusionsIn participants' accounts, informal coping absorbed harms that organisational systems did not address. Hospital managers could use these findings to check whether reporting, post-incident follow-up, training, staffing, and security arrangements work in practice. Participants' proposals require evaluation.

Indexed as

copingnursesorganisational supportpost-incident responsequalitative researchreflexive thematic analysisSaudi Arabiaworkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID42881780
PMCPMC13664904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.