ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Navigating Dental Implant Information on Social Media: A Qualitative Exploration of Digital Health Literacy and Resilience to Misinformation.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesSocial media has become a common source of information about dental implant treatment. While it offers easy access to treatment-related information, concerns remain about the quality and accuracy of online content. This study explored how patients evaluate and respond to dental implant information on social media and the factors and behaviors that may help them navigate potentially misleading information.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with adult patients attending a dental school clinic in Saudi Arabia. Participants were purposively recruited and interviewed between March and July 2026. Interviews explored social media use, perceptions of information credibility, experiences with misinformation, information verification practices, and treatment-related decision-making. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsFive themes were identified: (1) trust in professional and experiential sources, (2) verification before decision-making, (3) the influence of reputation and social proof, (4) skepticism toward potentially misleading information, and (5) social media as a source of information rather than a final authority. Participants commonly relied on dentists, cross-checked information across sources, drew on patient experiences and recommendations, and questioned exaggerated or commercially motivated claims before making treatment decisions.
conclusionsParticipants reported using trust, verification, social influences, and critical evaluation when navigating dental implant information on social media. These behaviors may support informed treatment-related decision-making and highlight the importance of digital health literacy, as well as the role of dentists and health organizations in providing accessible and trustworthy information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.