ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Equity Meets Primary-Care-Sensitive Performance: A Longitudinal Benchmark of Cost-Related Unmet Care and Avoidable Hospitalization in Europe.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis study compares European health systems by considering the cost-related unmet-care inequality between income groups and primary-care-sensitive avoidable hospitalizations.
methodsThis was a longitudinal comparative benchmarking study. The main sample consists of 275 country-year observations from 20 European countries with at least ten years of data during 2009-2023. The first dimension is measured by the absolute difference between the lowest and highest income quintiles in the prevalence of unmet medical examination or treatment because it was too expensive. The second dimension uses age- and sex-standardized avoidable hospitalization rates for asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and diabetes. The 20-country core sample was defined before within-year rank normalization. The indicators were converted into rank scores on a scale of 0-1 within each annual comparison set, with equal weighting for both dimensions. Temporal uncertainty in country rankings was examined using a three-year synchronized moving-block bootstrap with 10,000 iterations.
resultsIn the main comparison, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and Finland ranked in the top five. The Netherlands and Slovenia remained in the top five in all valid bootstrap replications; the corresponding probabilities were 99.90% for Spain, 90.67% for Sweden, and 95.66% for Finland. Top-five membership nevertheless changed under some alternative weighting, disease-omission, scaling, and balanced-period specifications. In the spending-adjusted assessment, each country was compared based on a nonlinear spending-performance relationship established from other countries, without including its own observations in the estimation equation; Slovenia, the Netherlands, and Spain took the top three positions.
conclusionsThe findings should be interpreted not as a definitive country ranking, but as a relative assessment of health systems that highlights the differences between health inequality, primary care-sensitive outcomes, and resource intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.