ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Medical Gaslighting in Urban Healthcare: A Bioecological Framework for Health Equity and Participatory System Transformation.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical gaslighting describes patient experiences in which symptoms, concerns, or interpretations of illness are minimized, dismissed, or insufficiently recognized within healthcare encounters. While the term initially emerged from patient and community narratives, recent empirical and conceptual studies (2019-2024) have further documented patterns of diagnostic overshadowing, credibility deficits, and structural contributors to patient invalidation. These findings indicate that interpersonal dismissal often reflects broader organizational and systemic dynamics. This paper proposes a bioecological framework for understanding medical gaslighting as a multi-level phenomenon within urban healthcare. Drawing on Bronfenbrenner's bio-ecological theory, Fricker's concept of epistemic injustice, Lipsky's theory of street-level bureaucracy, and participatory traditions advanced by Dewey, Freire, and community-based participatory research, the framework examines how experiences of invalidation arise through interactions among patients, clinicians, healthcare organizations, policies, and communities. Participatory approaches position patients and communities as partners in defining problems, generating knowledge, and designing solutions. This framework conceptually advances participatory knowledge production as a mechanism for organizational learning and system transformation. Addressing medical gaslighting requires more than improving communication; it requires recognizing lived experience as legitimate knowledge and redesigning healthcare systems to support partnership, continuity, and learning from the patients and communities they serve. Because this model has not yet been empirically validated, its components should be interpreted as theoretical propositions intended to guide future research. By connecting individual experiences to system-level transformation, healthcare organizations can strengthen equity, trust and human-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.