ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Adolescent Endometriosis: From Clinical Management to an Early Recognition and Prevention-Oriented Paradigm-A Narrative Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent endometriosis remains underrecognized, although symptoms often begin after menarche and diagnosis may be delayed for years. Severe dysmenorrhea, chronic or acyclic pelvic pain, school absenteeism, and impaired functioning should not be normalized. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on adolescent and early-onset endometriosis, focusing on early recognition, non-invasive assessment, individualized care, and function-preserving follow-up.
methodsA structured narrative review search supported by PubMed/MEDLINE was updated on 9 August 2026, focused mainly on the last decade, with selected older studies included when relevant. Adolescent-specific evidence was prioritized; adult or mixed-age data were used only when applicable to diagnosis, imaging, treatment safety, or pathophysiology. Evidence was synthesized descriptively; no meta-analysis, formal risk-of-bias assessment, or formal evidence grading was performed.
resultsThe synthesis included 58 unique publications. Direct adolescent evidence supports early suspicion in severe dysmenorrhea, refractory or acyclic pain, functional impairment, family history, and obstructive Müllerian anomalies. Imaging may identify endometriomas, deep endometriosis, adhesions, or adenomyosis-related features, but normal imaging does not exclude superficial disease. Biomarkers remain investigational in adolescents. Hormonal treatment is primarily supported for pain, bleeding, and functional outcomes.
conclusionsEarly recognition, timely referral, expert imaging when appropriate, individualized treatment, and follow-up centered on functional impact may reduce symptom burden in adolescents. Hormonal suppression is a clinically plausible strategy for symptom control and preservation of functioning, but it is not a proven disease-modifying or fertility-preserving intervention in adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.