ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Narrative Review of Medication Optimisation in Older Adults with Polypharmacy: From Structured Medication Review to AI-Enabled Medication Safety.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextPolypharmacy, commonly defined as the concurrent use of five or more medicines, and excessive polypharmacy, often defined as the use of ten or more medicines, are highly prevalent among older adults with multimorbidity. Although appropriate polypharmacy may be necessary, polypharmacy can be associated with adverse drug reactions, drug-drug interactions, falls, hospitalisation, cognitive impairment, non-adherence, treatment burden and (preventable) harm during transitions of care.
methodsThis narrative review examines medication optimisation in older adults, tracing its evolution from structured medication review, pharmacist-led interventions, explicit prescribing and deprescribing criteria to digital decision support, artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled pharmacovigilance and personalised medication-risk management. European implementation perspectives, with Belgium and Poland as illustrative examples, are used to examine how professional roles, reimbursement mechanisms, clinical tools and health-data infrastructure shape medication safety.
resultsThis review integrates geriatric medication optimisation, European implementation experience and AI-enabled pharmacovigilance within a framework linking risk detection, clinical interpretation and treatment optimisation. Current evidence is more consistent for improvements in prescribing quality and medication-related problems than for hard clinical outcomes such as mortality, falls or hospitalisation. AI-supported approaches may improve risk detection and prioritisation, but their clinical value depends on data quality, interoperability, explainability, external validation, human oversight and prospective evidence of patient benefit.
conclusionsFuture geriatric medication safety should combine comprehensive geriatric assessment, explicit clinical criteria, patient-centred deprescribing, pharmacist-led multidisciplinary review, interoperable health data and accountable AI-enabled decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.