Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42881678›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Narrative Review of Medication Optimisation in Older Adults with Polypharmacy: From Structured Medication Review to AI-Enabled Medication Safety.

Rania Aro, Zyta Beata Wojszel, Pierre Duez, Fabian Lecron, Stéphanie Patris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rania AroDepartment for Research Support and Technology Transfer, University of Mons (UMONS), 7000 Mons, Belgium.
Zyta Beata WojszelDepartment of Geriatrics, Medical University of Bialystok, Kilinski Str.1, 15-089 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6472-5241
Pierre DuezUnit of Therapeutic Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Mons (UMONS), 7000 Mons, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-1478
Fabian LecronDepartment of Engineering Innovation Management, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mons, 7000 Mons, Belgium.
Stéphanie PatrisUnit of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Mons (UMONS), 7000 Mons, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0753-5422

Funding

National Agency for Academic Exchange BPI/WUE/2024/1/00012/U/00001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPolypharmacy, commonly defined as the concurrent use of five or more medicines, and excessive polypharmacy, often defined as the use of ten or more medicines, are highly prevalent among older adults with multimorbidity. Although appropriate polypharmacy may be necessary, polypharmacy can be associated with adverse drug reactions, drug-drug interactions, falls, hospitalisation, cognitive impairment, non-adherence, treatment burden and (preventable) harm during transitions of care.

methodsThis narrative review examines medication optimisation in older adults, tracing its evolution from structured medication review, pharmacist-led interventions, explicit prescribing and deprescribing criteria to digital decision support, artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled pharmacovigilance and personalised medication-risk management. European implementation perspectives, with Belgium and Poland as illustrative examples, are used to examine how professional roles, reimbursement mechanisms, clinical tools and health-data infrastructure shape medication safety.

resultsThis review integrates geriatric medication optimisation, European implementation experience and AI-enabled pharmacovigilance within a framework linking risk detection, clinical interpretation and treatment optimisation. Current evidence is more consistent for improvements in prescribing quality and medication-related problems than for hard clinical outcomes such as mortality, falls or hospitalisation. AI-supported approaches may improve risk detection and prioritisation, but their clinical value depends on data quality, interoperability, explainability, external validation, human oversight and prospective evidence of patient benefit.

conclusionsFuture geriatric medication safety should combine comprehensive geriatric assessment, explicit clinical criteria, patient-centred deprescribing, pharmacist-led multidisciplinary review, interoperable health data and accountable AI-enabled decision support.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical pharmacydeprescribingmedication optimisationmedication reviewmedication safetyolder adultspharmacovigilancepolypharmacypotentially inappropriate medications

Identifiers

PMID42881678
PMCPMC13665473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.