ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Temporary Nurse Staffing in the Context of Nursing Shortages: A Narrative Review of Workforce Flexibility, Organizational Trade-Offs, and Patient Safety.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nursing shortages require hospitals to balance staffing adequacy with flexibility in responding to vacancies, fluctuating demand, and unexpected service pressures. This focused narrative review examines temporary nurse staffing in acute hospitals, with primary emphasis on agency, travel, and contract registered nurses, and integrates evidence on workforce demand, operational flexibility, economic and workforce consequences, clinical integration, and patient safety. Evidence was identified through targeted PubMed and Scopus searches, citation tracking, and supplementary literature discovery. Temporary staffing can provide adaptive capacity by redistributing available nursing labor and reducing exposure to unfilled staffing requirements, but it does not eliminate underlying workforce scarcity. The evidence does not support treating temporary nurses as intrinsically less competent or inherently unsafe. Outcomes instead vary with the intensity and persistence of temporary staff use, baseline staffing adequacy, work environment, familiarity with local systems, orientation, and organizational integration. Limited supplementation may be operationally and economically useful in some contexts, whereas recurrent high reliance may increase coordination demands, workforce strain, and costs and may be associated with selected adverse outcomes. Temporary staffing is therefore best evaluated as one component of the overall staffing configuration and against realistic alternatives, including permanent staffing, overtime, flexible internal staffing, reduced capacity, or unresolved understaffing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.