ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Emotional Distress Statistically Accounts for the Cross-Sectional Association Between Spiritual Well-Being and Global Quality of Life in Patients with Cancer.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesSpiritual well-being is consistently associated with better quality of life in oncology, but the pathways involved are disputed. Two competing accounts exist: spiritual well-being may buffer patients against the impact of physical symptoms, or it may act mainly through emotional distress. We examined whether cross-sectional data from a Romanian cancer cohort are compatible with either account. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this single-centre cross-sectional study, 175 adults with cancer completed the FACIT-Sp-12, the Religious Commitment Inventory-10, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; the FACIT-Sp-12, QLQ-C30 and HADS were administered in locally adapted formats that deviate from the validated instruments, so all findings pertain to these adapted versions. Patients were grouped by tertile of FACIT-Sp-12 score. The primary outcome was global health status/quality of life. Multivariable linear regression with heteroscedasticity-consistent standard errors, prespecified bootstrapped mediation analyses (interpreted as cross-sectional statistical decompositions), a multiplicative moderation test, restricted cubic splines and nine prespecified sensitivity analyses were performed.
resultsPatients were 62.2 ± 13.1 years old, 65.1% had advanced disease and 51.4% screened positive for clinically significant distress (HADS-Anxiety or HADS-Depression ≥ 8). Global quality of life rose monotonically across spiritual well-being tertiles (53.8 ± 28.0, 65.9 ± 22.3 and 74.5 ± 23.1 points;
conclusionsHigher scores on the adapted FACIT-Sp-12 were cross-sectionally associated with better global quality of life and lower emotional distress. Anxiety and depression statistically accounted for part of this association, but temporal ordering and causality cannot be determined from these data, and the interaction analysis was too imprecise to support or exclude buffering. Routine assessment of spiritual and emotional concerns alongside symptom control is supported; whether interventions that increase spiritual well-being improve quality of life requires longitudinal and interventional study using the validated instrument formats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.