Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42881572›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Spirometry in Primary Healthcare: Opportunities for Early Detection of Small Airway Dysfunction.

Nowaf Y Alobaidi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nowaf Y AlobaidiDepartment of Respiratory Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Alahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0609-5771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spirometry underuse and persistent limitations in its technical quality and interpretation in primary healthcare (PHC) contribute to delayed and inaccurate diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently demonstrated, at the randomised controlled trial level, that it can improve spirometry interpretation by primary care clinicians. Maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), a spirometric measure routinely derived from every forced expiratory manoeuvre, has been associated with subsequent airflow obstruction and lung function decline, particularly when conventional spirometric indices remain preserved, suggesting that it may contribute to earlier recognition of small airway dysfunction. However, no existing review has examined whether AI could specifically address the challenge of MMEF interpretation, and the incremental value of MMEF within AI-assisted spirometry models remains unestablished. This narrative review synthesises current evidence on AI-assisted spirometry in PHC across three evidence domains, diagnostic classification, quality control, and computational small airway assessment, and examines the potential for integrating MMEF with conventional spirometric indices, flow-volume curve morphology, technical quality, clinical characteristics, and longitudinal data to support its clinical interpretation. The available evidence supports the feasibility of the individual components underpinning this proposed framework, including AI-assisted spirometry interpretation, automated quality assessment, and computational extraction of small airway information from spirometric data. However, the contextual integration of MMEF within AI-assisted models has not yet been prospectively evaluated, and validation of its incremental predictive value and clinical utility is needed before implementation can be recommended.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical decision supportCOPDearly detectionFEF25–75%machine learningMMEFprimary caresmall airway dysfunctionspirometry

Identifiers

PMID42881572
PMCPMC13664965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.