ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Spirometry in Primary Healthcare: Opportunities for Early Detection of Small Airway Dysfunction.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spirometry underuse and persistent limitations in its technical quality and interpretation in primary healthcare (PHC) contribute to delayed and inaccurate diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently demonstrated, at the randomised controlled trial level, that it can improve spirometry interpretation by primary care clinicians. Maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), a spirometric measure routinely derived from every forced expiratory manoeuvre, has been associated with subsequent airflow obstruction and lung function decline, particularly when conventional spirometric indices remain preserved, suggesting that it may contribute to earlier recognition of small airway dysfunction. However, no existing review has examined whether AI could specifically address the challenge of MMEF interpretation, and the incremental value of MMEF within AI-assisted spirometry models remains unestablished. This narrative review synthesises current evidence on AI-assisted spirometry in PHC across three evidence domains, diagnostic classification, quality control, and computational small airway assessment, and examines the potential for integrating MMEF with conventional spirometric indices, flow-volume curve morphology, technical quality, clinical characteristics, and longitudinal data to support its clinical interpretation. The available evidence supports the feasibility of the individual components underpinning this proposed framework, including AI-assisted spirometry interpretation, automated quality assessment, and computational extraction of small airway information from spirometric data. However, the contextual integration of MMEF within AI-assisted models has not yet been prospectively evaluated, and validation of its incremental predictive value and clinical utility is needed before implementation can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.