ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Molecular Landscapes of Tumor Dormancy in Gynecologic Malignancies: From Survival Mechanisms to Precision Interception.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Late recurrence in gynecologic malignancies is associated with tumor dormancy and persistent minimal residual disease (MRD). Although current treatments reduce proliferating tumor burden, residual cells may survive therapy and drive delayed relapse. This Review examines dormancy in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers using entry, maintenance, and awakening as an organizing framework rather than a universally demonstrated sequence. Direct evidence is concentrated in ovarian cancer, whereas evidence in endometrial and cervical cancers remains predominantly indirect. We delineate candidate biological dependencies-including redox control, lipid peroxidation buffering, mitochondrial plasticity, adaptive stress-response programs, epigenetic and post-transcriptional plasticity, immune regulation, and extracellular matrix remodeling-rather than established vulnerabilities. On this basis, we evaluate two biologically distinct investigational concepts: suppression of reactivation-associated signals to prolong clinical latency, and state modulation followed by biomarker-defined treatment, discussed within established disease-specific care pathways. Finally, we propose a translational framework combining longitudinal liquid biopsy with spatial and single-cell profiling for MRD monitoring, biological stratification, and future probabilistic inference of residual-cell states. Together, these concepts support a shift from reactive relapse treatment toward evidence- and risk-constrained recurrence-interception research and provide a framework for validating residual-state biomarkers and therapeutic dependencies in gynecologic malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.