ArticleReproductive health2026
Stakeholders' views on comprehensive sexuality education in Sierra Leone: a critical theory analysis.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComprehensive Sexuality Education is crucial for equipping young people with the knowledge and skills necessary to make informed decisions about their sexual health and well-being. We explored stakeholders' perspectives on Comprehensive Sexuality Education in Sierra Leone through a critical theory lens, emphasising the power structures, economic conditions, and cultural norms that shape educational realities. Specifically, we asked how power relations, gender norms, economic vulnerability, and institutional authority shape stakeholders' perceptions and implementation of Comprehensive Sexuality Education.
methodsA qualitative research design was employed, utilising purposive sampling to capture diverse viewpoints from 127 key informant interviews and 61 focus group discussions involving 366 participants across 11 schools in various provinces. Focus group discussions were conducted in sex-disaggregated groups so that male and female students' perspectives were captured equally. Data analysis incorporated deductive and inductive thematic analysis, revealing how social norms, economic factors, and power relations affect educational practices and policies.
resultsOur findings reveal that educational authorities in Sierra Leone often adopt a conservative approach to Comprehensive Sexuality Education, prioritising traditional frameworks over comprehensive, reality-based instruction. While stakeholders recognise the importance of sexual and reproductive health education, there is widespread concern that practical methods, such as condom demonstrations, could encourage inappropriate behaviours. Gender dynamics play a crucial role, with a disproportionate focus on female students, who are seen as responsible for managing sexual risks, thereby marginalising male students and perpetuating traditional gender roles. Additionally, economic conditions complicate Comprehensive Sexuality Education implementation, as financial hardships influence students' sexual decision-making, often leading to risky behaviours. The successful implementation of Comprehensive Sexuality Education depends on teacher training, community engagement, societal attitudes, and policy support, but societal stigmas surrounding sexual health discussions remain significant barriers, underscoring the need for initiatives that foster open dialogue.
conclusionOur study underscores the need for a transformative approach to Comprehensive Sexuality Education in Sierra Leone that addresses power dynamics, gender disparities, and economic influences, ultimately fostering a more equitable and effective educational environment for all students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42881465What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.