Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42881464›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychology2026

Beyond the finish line: a systematic review of participation motivation and engagement in amateur marathoners.

Juan Cui, Eng Wah Teo, Jindong Chang, Zhuoling Lei

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan CuiFaculty of Sports and Exercise Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Eng Wah TeoFaculty of Sports and Exercise Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia. vteo2@um.edu.my.
Jindong ChangSchool of Physical Education, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Zhuoling LeiSchool of Physical Education, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the rapid global growth of amateur marathon participation, evidence on the motivational factors that initiate and sustain participation remains fragmented and has yet to be systematically reviewed and synthesized.

objectiveTo synthesize empirical evidence on participation motivation among amateur marathon runners and to examine how motivational patterns vary across runner characteristics, participation contexts, and stages of engagement.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. Searches of Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and the Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection, supplemented by manual citation searching, identified 415 records. After duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, and full-text eligibility assessment, 16 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria.

resultsSixteen studies of amateur runners aged 18-72 years were included in this review. Most studies were conducted in Europe. Overall, the methodological quality of the included studies was moderate according to the MMAT assessment, with only two studies meeting all appraisal criteria. Four main categories of participation motives emerged and were divided into: health-related motives (n = 16), achievement motives (n = 14), psychological motives (n = 13), and social motives (n = 10). Health motives were consistently the strongest motivations for participation, and achievement, psychological, and social motives varied by gender, age, experience level, and race. Based on the above data, motivations often shift over time, with initial participation commonly driven by health or weight control, and long-term engagement increasingly supported by psychological well-being, habit formation, and social connection.

conclusionsMotivation among amateur marathon runners is multidimensional and appears to evolve across participation stages and life circumstances. Sustained participation depends not only on health and performance goals but also on psychological and social processes that support long-term engagement. To facilitate future research synthesis, subsequent systematic reviews or meta-analyses must focus on four critical pillars: (1) need for higher-quality studies; (2) larger and more diverse samples to capture a broader runner population; (3) standardization of methods and measurements to facilitate cross-study comparability; and (4) examination of understudied variables or populations. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

AthletesMarathon RunningMotivationAdultHumansMiddle AgedAmateur athletesEndurance sportMarathon participationParticipation motivationSport motivation

Identifiers

PMID42881464
PMCPMC13673869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.