ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of deep vein thrombosis in elderly ICU patients: multicenter development and external validation.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a frequent complication in elderly intensive care unit (ICU) patients, while reliable prediction tools for this population remain limited. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of DVT in critically ill elderly patients.
methodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, ICU patients aged ≥ 75 years from two tertiary medical centers in China were enrolled. Patients with pre-existing DVT were excluded. A development cohort (Suzhou, n = 1,717) and an external validation cohort (Xi'an, n = 533) were established. Clinical variables collected within 24 h after ICU admission were used to predict incident DVT during ICU stay. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was applied for feature selection, and four machine learning models were developed and compared. Model discrimination, calibration, and interpretability were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), calibration analysis, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsDVT occurred in 15.2% and 21.0% of patients in the development and external validation cohorts, respectively. Among the evaluated models, XGBoost achieved the best performance, with AUCs of 0.843 in internal validation and 0.811 in external validation. Calibration analysis demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed risks. Key predictors included D-dimer, C-reactive protein, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, procalcitonin, mechanical ventilation, and mechanical thromboprophylaxis. SHAP analysis quantified the contribution of individual predictors.
conclusionsWe developed and externally validated an interpretable machine learning model for early DVT prediction in elderly ICU patients. The model may support risk stratification and clinical decision-making in critical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42881451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.