Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42881406›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2026

'People need to be a bit more understanding that my body is wrecked': A qualitative exploration of inpatient hospital care for people living with multiple long-term conditions.

Sue Bellass, Thomas Scharf, Miles D Witham, Lynsey Threlfall, Chris Plummer, Avan A Sayer, Rachel Cooper, ADMISSION Research Collaborative

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sue BellassAGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. sue.bellass@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9383-4116
Thomas ScharfPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Miles D WithamAGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Lynsey ThrelfallNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Chris PlummerNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Avan A SayerAGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Rachel CooperAGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
ADMISSION Research Collaborative

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research MR/V033654/1UKRI MR/V033654/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiving with multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) is becoming increasingly common with far-reaching consequences for individuals and healthcare systems. People with MLTC often face complex care pathways through health systems - especially hospitals, which are largely configured for specialist treatment of single conditions - yet evidence on people with MLTC's lived experience in the hospital setting is limited. This study aimed to understand the hospital care experiences of people living with MLTC who had recently had an inpatient stay.

methodsPeople with MLTC who had experienced an inpatient stay in hospital within the previous six months were recruited via three hospitals in England and via patient networks. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with each participant, focussing on their experiences of care from admission to discharge. An inductive thematic analysis was undertaken.

resultsA total of 44 people (mean age 68.4 years, 23 women) who reported living with between 2 and 11 long-term conditions, the majority of whom (96%) reported that their most recent hospital stay was unplanned, participated in the study. Three themes were constructed from the interview data, reflecting perceptions at individual, interpersonal and organisational levels. Participants' experiences were shaped by internalised narratives of hospital care, where care was expected to be focussed primarily on single conditions within a resource-constrained environment. Relationally, the degree of alignment between clinician and patient knowledge on conditions was a key contributor to whether hospital care was experienced positively or negatively, and participants' perceptions of organisational constraints to holistic care gave insights into their views on system-level barriers shaping the provision of care for MLTC in the hospital setting.

conclusionsExperiences of inpatient hospital care for people with MLTC are complex, diverse and shaped by expectations of care in a specialist setting configured to provide care for single conditions. Healthcare professionals should incorporate patients' experiential expertise into decision-making processes through consultation with people with lived experience of MLTC. Redesigning hospital services to provide holistic care will require flexibility to respond to the wide spectrum of MLTC experiences.

Indexed as

HospitalizationInpatientsMultiple Chronic ConditionsAgedAged, 80 and overEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchHospital careMultimorbidityMultiple long-term conditionsQualitative research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.