Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42881400›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2026

Assessing consequences of anthropogenic hybridization: Great Lakes mallard movement and resource selection.

Benjamin Z Luukkonen, Scott R Winterstein, Daniel B Hayes, Drew N Fowler, Gregory J Soulliere, John M Coluccy, Brendan Shirkey, John Simpson, Amy A Shipley, Jason M Winiarski and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Benjamin Z LuukkonenWildlife Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, 621 10th St, Plainwell, MI, 49080, USA. luukkonenb1@michigan.gov.
Scott R WintersteinDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, 480 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Daniel B HayesDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, 480 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Drew N FowlerLouisiana Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, U.S. Geological Survey, 224 Renewable Natural Resources Building, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Gregory J SoulliereRetired, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Upper Mississippi/Great Lakes Joint Venture, 2651 Coolidge Rd, Suite 101, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA.
John M ColuccyDucks Unlimited Inc., 7322 Newman Blvd Building 2, Dexter, MI, 48130, USA.
Brendan ShirkeyWinous Point Marsh Conservancy, 3500 South Lattimore Road, Port, Clinton, OH, 43452, USA.
John SimpsonWinous Point Marsh Conservancy, 3500 South Lattimore Road, Port, Clinton, OH, 43452, USA.
Amy A ShipleyWisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Office of Applied Science, 2801 Progress Rd, Madison, WI, 53716, USA.
Jason M WiniarskiDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1630 Linden Dr, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Benjamin J O'NealDepartment of Biology, Franklin College, 101 Branigin Blvd, Franklin, IN, 46131, USA.
Joshua M OsbornForbes Biological Station-Bellrose Waterfowl Research Center, Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Havana, IL, 62644, USA.
Barbara A AversWildlife Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, 4166 Legacy Pkwy, Lansing, MI, 48910, USA.
Vergie M MusniDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Texas El Paso, 500 W University, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Philip LavretskyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Texas El Paso, 500 W University, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.

Funding

Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act GG 751210000001883Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division WLD2101National Science Foundation 2010704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe release of domesticated animals is resulting in anthropogenic hybridization with their wild congeners and there is concern that these interactions are a risk to conservation. In North America, large-scale releases of domesticated mallards have continued for over a century, yet the potential ecological consequences are not well understood. Towards this, we assessed whether hybridization between game-farm and wild mallards was associated with variation in movement and resource selection behavior, which in turn can affect survival and reproduction.

methodsWe coupled genomic, telemetry, and remotely sensed spatial data for 592 female mallards sampled from 2021 to 2023 in the Great Lakes region of North America and tested for association between an individual's level of domestic ancestry, their local and migratory movement, and resource selection during the non-breeding period. We used linear mixed models and general linear models to examine factors affecting daily movement distance and autumn migration probability, respectively. We implemented a step-selection function and conditional logistic regression to estimate relative selection strength of land cover types relevant to mallard resource use.

resultsWe recovered 44% of GPS-marked birds as genetically wild, with the remaining 56% being feral game-farm or wild × game-farm mallard hybrids. Increased domestic ancestry was associated with shorter daily movement distances, decreased likelihood of migration, and higher selection for urban developed land cover.

conclusionsLower mobility and selection of urban areas by individuals with greater domestic ancestry warrant further investigation as factors potentially affecting survival and reproduction.

Indexed as

AdaptationGeneticsHabitat selectionHybridizationMallardMovementUrban

Identifiers

PMID42881400
PMCPMC13670739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.