ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Agricultural traits, silage quality and bacterial community structure changes of different sorghum varieties in cold regions of Hulunbuir.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selecting high-quality forage varieties is essential for stabilizing regional forage supply and enhancing feed conversion efficiency. This study evaluated agronomic traits, nutritive value, and fermentation characteristics of five forage sorghum varieties (FS3501, QCDS, F10, 3701, and DJ) from the cold Hulunbuir region of China. All cultivars were harvested at the milk-ripe stage to measure plant height and dry matter (DM) yield. Forage was chopped, vacuum-sealed, and ensiled at 25 °C for 60 days. Post-fermentation, nutritional composition and fermentation parameters were analyzed. Additionally, 16 S rRNA gene sequencing with KEGG pathway analysis assessed bacterial community structure and metabolic function dynamics.Results showed that the 3701 (SB4) variety had superior production performance, with the highest (p < 0.05) plant height (2.54 m vs. 1.54-1.93 m) and DM yield (1567.65 kg/hm² vs. 800.40-1067.20 kg/hm²). SB4 also exhibited optimal silage fermentation, featuring the lowest pH (3.58 vs. 3.63-3.74), highest crude protein (6.79 vs. 3.44-6.43 g/kg DM), and lactic acid content (33.00 vs. 16.80-25.52 g/kg DM). Furthermore, SB4 significantly reduced neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) levels. Microbial analysis revealed decreased α-diversity and a shift from Proteobacteria to Firmicutes, with SB4 silage dominated by Lactobacillus. KEGG functional prediction indicated that carbohydrate metabolism was the predominant metabolic pathway. These findings highlight SB4 as a superior forage variety suitable for cultivation and silage production in high-latitude cold regions like Hulunbuir.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42881381What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.