ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Attentional emotional bias in Huntington's disease: The "Hyper-Positive" effect.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In addition to motor symptoms, Huntington's disease (HD) is associated with cognitive deficits, including the ability to recognize emotions (fear, disgust, and anger) from faces and voices, while happiness and neutral expressions are relatively preserved. Yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We investigated both explicit emotion recognition and implicit attentional biases in manifest HD patients to assess whether altered attentional orienting may explain the selective deficit in negative emotions. To our knowledge, this represents the first study of its kind in HD. Twenty patients with manifest HD and 25 controls completed an explicit facial emotion recognition task (neutral, disgust, fear, and happiness) and two dot-probe tasks (100 ms and 500 ms SOAs) to dissociate automatic and controlled attentional processes. Attentional Facilitation Index (AFI) and Disengagement Index (DI) were calculated. Huntington's disease patients showed reduced accuracy and slower reaction times in recognizing negative emotions (fear and disgust). At the 100-ms SOA in the dot-probe task, they exhibited reduced attentional facilitation for fearful faces and greater facilitation for happy faces compared with controls, with a similar pattern observed for attentional disengagement. No significant differences emerged at 500 ms SOA. These findings reveal a "hyperpositivity effect" in HD: an early automatic prioritization of positive stimuli alongside reduced attentional capture by negative ones. This pattern, which parallels the positivity bias in normal aging, may contribute to the selective impairment in negative emotion recognition. A plausible underlying mechanism involves striatal dopaminergic dysregulation. Longitudinal studies in premanifest gene carriers are needed to clarify this bias's development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42881330What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.