ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026
Using Artificial Intelligence to Access Reproductive Healthcare Information by U.S. States Following Sexual Assault.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is currently wide variability across U.S. states regarding the legality of abortion with some states having relatively open access to abortion services and others with a total or near total ban on abortion access. Further complicating these state-by-state differences is the variability in policies and procedures with regard to exemptions (e.g., rape, incest) that may allow women access to abortion services that otherwise would be banned in that state. Factors such as a victim's alcohol use at the time of rape and victim's rape acknowledgment may delay or prevent women from seeking medical care post-assault. To help navigate potential confusion regarding state-level policies and requirements to access abortion services following a rape in which they became pregnant, women may use Artificial Intelligence tools, including ChatGPT, for reproductive health care information. Thus, we sought to qualitatively examine information provided by ChatGPT-4o to women seeking information on how to access abortions in each state depending on their alcohol use and rape acknowledgment after finding out they are pregnant following a rape. Using data collected between October 31 and November 11, 2024, we systematically analyzed ChatGPT-4o's responses to abortion access requests across all 50 U.S. states using four prompts that varied by alcohol use and rape acknowledgment, and qualitatively coded responses for accuracy, helpfulness, and inclusion of empathic statements. Results revealed no significant differences in ChatGPT-4o responses across prompt conditions and one difference based on U.S. state level abortion access restriction. Responses in states with more severe restrictions were more likely to include information on rape exemptions than states with less restrictions in abortion access. However, responses often failed to include helpful information and statements reflective of empathic tone, which may exacerbate pre-existing disparities across U.S. states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42881327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.