ReviewCurrent oncology reports2026
Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Non-Invasive Assessment Across the Continuum.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewClinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is a key determinant of surgical candidacy, locoregional therapy safety, and systemic treatment outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet its non-invasive assessment remains challenging because the Baveno criteria were derived in HCC-free cirrhosis. This review synthesises current evidence on non-invasive tests (NITs) for CSPH across the HCC care continuum, organised around three clinical scenarios: pre-operative assessment, on-treatment monitoring, and pre-immunotherapy evaluation. RECENT
findingsLiver stiffness-based Baveno rule-out retains value in early HCC but can miss haemodynamically confirmed CSPH in up to 23% of patients with favourable criteria. Spleen stiffness and imaging surrogates offer higher specificity, and longitudinal NIT monitoring is emerging as a need during locoregional and systemic therapy, which themselves can modify portal pressure. Real-world data report variceal bleeding in about 7% of patients receiving atezolizumab-bevacizumab, supporting variceal screening before anti-angiogenic treatment. AI-based multimodal models show promise in cirrhosis but lack HCC-specific validation. A scenario-based NIT strategy integrating liver stiffness, spleen stiffness, imaging collaterals, and selective HVPG measurement can guide CSPH assessment from surgical candidacy through systemic treatment. HCC-specific thresholds, longitudinal validation, and randomised evaluation of NSBB prophylaxis during immunotherapy are the highest-priority research areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42881321What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.