Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42881284›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

Environmental impact of a radiology department: greenhouse gas emissions and primary energy accounting and strategies for sustainable practice.

Stefania Rizzo, Christoph Rüesch, Marco Budin, Rolf Wyttenbach, Ermidio Rezzonico, Filippo Del Grande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefania RizzoDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Integrated Diagnostic of Southern Switzerland (IDISI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland. Stefania.rizzo@eoc.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5151-0866
Christoph RüeschEnertel GmbH, Grono, Switzerland.
Marco BudinDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Integrated Diagnostic of Southern Switzerland (IDISI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland.
Rolf WyttenbachDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Integrated Diagnostic of Southern Switzerland (IDISI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland.
Ermidio RezzonicoDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Integrated Diagnostic of Southern Switzerland (IDISI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland.
Filippo Del GrandeDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Integrated Diagnostic of Southern Switzerland (IDISI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the environmental impact of a radiology department's operations (primary energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG); to identify the main levers for reduction. MATERIALS AND

methodsData collection included measured and calculated energy consumption of imaging machines (2 MRI, 2 CT, 1 interventional radiology (IR) suite, 2 US, 3 radiography machines), workstations, lighting, ventilation; cooling and heating for imaging systems and rooms; materials/pharmaceuticals; external services (e.g. laundry and information technology (IT)). The electrical energy consumption of building systems, lighting, and IT equipment was primarily determined through measurements; other energy consumption figures were estimated using technical data and meteorological data. For the calculation of GHG emissions and primary energy consumption, a specialised tool using specific conversion factors from established environmental databases was developed.

resultsOur hospital switched from coal-based electricity to renewable electrical energy (hydropower), leading to a reduction in primary energy consumption (-64%) and GHG emissions (-92%) of the radiology department. Following this change, without a reduction in direct energy consumption, the MRI systems showed a marked reduction in primary energy consumption, although still having the highest primary energy consumption per exam (49.2 kWh compared to 13.9 kWh (CT1) and 48.9 kWh (IR)). After the transition to renewable energy, the major source of GHG emissions shifted from electrical energy toward materials/pharmaceuticals.

conclusionOur findings support the transition to renewable energy sources for electricity, as a key strategy for reducing GHG emissions and primary energy demand of radiology departments. Following this shift, selecting materials and pharmaceuticals with lower emissions and primary energy factors can further mitigate the environmental impact. KEY POINTS: Question Radiology departments are significant sources of energy consumption and GHG emissions. Findings Adoption of renewable energy reduces primary energy consumption and GHG emissions. Critical relevance statement GHG emissions in a radiology department can be significantly reduced by transitioning to renewable energy sources. After this shift, emissions will mainly depend on the materials and pharmaceuticals used, such as disposable supplies and contrast agents.

Indexed as

CTGHG emissionsMRIPrimary energyUS

Identifiers

PMID42881284
PMCPMC13672723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.