ReviewPediatric research2026
Neurobehavioural outcomes after term IUGR from adolescence to adulthood: a cross-species scoping review.
Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with long-term neurobehavioural alterations. This scoping review mapped evidence on neurobehavioural outcomes following IUGR in term-born humans and preclinical animal models. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, six databases were searched from January 1985 to February 2025. Clinical studies were included if they assessed motor, cognitive, or anxiety outcomes in adolescents or young adults born at term with IUGR, small for gestational age (SGA), or low birth weight (LBW). Preclinical studies were included if IUGR was induced via placental insufficiency and behavioural outcomes evaluated at equivalent developmental stages. Data were charted and synthesised narratively. Twenty-eight studies (16 clinical, 12 preclinical) were included. Motor and cognitive outcomes were frequently assessed; anxiety-related behaviours were examined in fewer clinical studies despite frequent assessment in preclinical models. Motor coordination and memory outcomes were reported in both human and animal studies, though inconsistent diagnostic criteria and heterogeneous outcome measures limited cross-species comparisons. Most clinical studies classified participants as SGA or LBW; only two applied antenatal criteria to confirm IUGR. This evidence map reveals broad coverage of motor and cognitive domains but limited examination of anxiety outcomes in clinical populations. Standardising diagnostics and aligning behavioural assessments across species are priorities for translational comparability. This review was originally registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020197400) as a systematic review. The protocol has since been adapted to a scoping review framework; the PROSPERO registration reflects the original systematic review methodology, as PROSPERO does not accept scoping review registration. The adapted methodology is described in the Methods section below. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42020197400 . IMPACT: This is the first scoping review to map both clinical and preclinical evidence on neurobehavioural outcomes following IUGR beyond childhood into adolescence and young adulthood. Motor and cognitive outcomes are widely studied across species, but anxiety domains remain under-examined, particularly in human cohorts. Diagnostic inconsistency (SGA/LBW used as proxies for IUGR) and narrow species representation in preclinical studies are major barriers to translational alignment.
Identifiers
42881265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.