ArticleBiogerontology2026
Quantitative assessment of liver regenerative potential during accelerated aging: regenerative reserve and regenerative status indices.
Article in Biogerontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age-related changes in hepatocyte ploidy, binucleation, proliferative activity, and senescence-associated cell-cycle arrest may jointly influence liver regenerative capacity, but these features are usually evaluated separately. We developed two composite indices and examined their behavior in a long-term rat model of chronic circadian disruption. Male Wistar rats were assigned to control lighting, constant illumination (dark deprivation; DD), or constant illumination with melatonin (DD + melatonin, 10 mg/kg five times weekly) and assessed at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The Index of Regenerative Reserve (IRR) was defined as the proportion of binucleated hepatocytes divided by mean hepatocyte ploidy. The Integrated Index of Regenerative Status (IRS) further incorporated Ki-67 (a marker of active cell proliferation) and p21 (a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor associated with cell-cycle arrest) as fractional terms: IRS = IRR × (1 + Ki-67)/(1 + p21).In DD animals, IRR declined from 2.00 ± 0.42 at 6 months to 0.386 ± 0.19 at 24 months; the corresponding 24-month IRS was 0.32 ± 0.17. In DD + melatonin animals, 24-month IRR and IRS were 2.285 ± 0.41 and 2.08 ± 0.16, respectively. Exploratory receiver-operating-characteristic analysis yielded areas under the curve of 0.843 for IRR and 0.905 for IRS. These findings support IRR and IRS as experimental composite descriptors of the hepatic regenerative phenotype. External validation and direct functional regeneration assays are required before broader biological or clinical interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42881261What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.