ArticleOncogene2026
Dynamic remodeling of the KRAS interactome by direct RAS inhibitors with distinct mechanism of action reveals convergent responses.
Article in Oncogene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
KRAS is mutated in 30% of all human cancers. Small molecule inhibitors targeting KRAS with distinct mechanisms-of-action and variable specificities have entered the clinic, but their full effect on the RAS signaling network remains unclear. Here, we described the impact of RAS inhibition on the KRAS interactome using Proximity-dependent Biotin Identification. Two inhibitors were used: panRAS-ON, which forms a ternary complex between cyclophilin and RAS in the GTP-bound state; panKRAS-off, which binds to the KRAS switch II pocket. RAS inhibitors were found to significantly alter 16.5% of proteins in proximity to KRAS. Despite their distinct modality, the KRAS inhibitors induced highly correlated changes in the KRAS interactomes. Among KRAS-proximal proteins, Afadin was highly affected by RAS inhibition. AFDN is a key regulator of cell motility, invasion, and metastasis. Analysis of AFDN phosphorylation revealed that AKT only partially modulates p-Ser1718, while KRAS inhibition sufficiently abolished EGF-mediated AFDN phosphorylation. Silencing AFDN in a KRAS-driven non-small cell lung cancer model abolished chemotaxis and disrupted directional migration in an EGF-driven wound healing model. We demonstrated that KRAS is a central node in regulating growth factor-induced cell migration, and that KRAS inhibition plays a broader role than MAPK-mediated cell proliferation and survival.
Identifiers
42881251What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.