ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2026
Dengue virus infection.
Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue is an acute febrile disease caused by the Aedes mosquito-borne dengue viruses (DENV-1 to DENV-4). Annually, approximately 100 million people fall ill with dengue, which can cause debilitating pain and discomfort, reducing both physical functioning and quality of life. Some patients progress to life-threatening inflammation-driven circulatory failure. Disease burden remains primarily in urban centres; however, factors including increased travel and climate change are rapidly expanding the geographical distribution of dengue to rural and peri-urban environments. Dengue is diagnosed based on compatible clinical features, detection of viral RNA or antigens, or serological testing, depending on the phase of illness. There is no licensed antiviral or host-directed therapy for dengue; management is supportive, with close clinical monitoring and judicious fluid replacement to prevent circulatory failure while avoiding fluid overload. Thus, there is an increasing need for clinicians to be familiar with the clinical features, disease burden and management of dengue, along with the newly recognized post-acute sequelae. Although dengue vaccines have been licensed in several countries, their use has been restricted by uncertainties in dengue pathogenesis. Attention should be focused on how to use currently available vaccines to create the foundation of a larger strategy to mitigate dengue transmission and maximize public health impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42881211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.