Trial reportBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2026
[Short-term clinical outcomes of complete dentures fabricated by conventional and CAD/CAM milling techniques: A self-controlled study with randomized wearing sequence].
Trial report in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo preliminarily compare the short-term clinical outcomes of conventional and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) monolithic milled complete dentures and to provide clinical evidence for selecting a digital complete-denture fabrication technique.
methodsSeven edentulous patients were enrolled in a self-controlled study with a randomized wearing sequence. Each participant received one conventionally fabricated complete denture and one CAD/CAM monolithic milled complete denture. The fabrication technique was not actively disclosed before subjective assessment. A 2-week washout period, during which the participants wore their previous dentures, separated the two wearing periods. Subjective visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for overall satisfaction, mandibular denture retention, masticatory function, mucosal comfort, speech, and esthetics, together with pressure-point count, objective mandibular retention force, and objective masticatory efficiency, were assessed at insertion, 1 week, and 1 month. Within-patient comparisons between the two techniques were performed at each time point. Overall satisfaction, pressure-point count, objective retention force, and objective masticatory efficiency were additionally analyzed using a 2×3 fully within-subject repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc comparisons.
resultsSignificant between-process differences in satisfaction, aesthetics, retention VAS, mastication VAS, and pressure point counts were found over three time points (all
conclusionIn this small, short-term, within-patient study with a randomized wearing sequence, CAD/CAM monolithic milled complete dentures showed advantages in several patient-reported outcomes, objective mandibular retention force, and objective masticatory efficiency at 1 week and 1 month. These advantages did not extend to all outcomes or time points, and the between-technique difference in pressure-point count narrowed over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42880913PMC13672157What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.