Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42880829›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2026

Core and Keystone Epiphytic and Endophytic Bacteria Associated With Potato Leaves Are Driven by Cultivar and Site.

Sumitra Saha, Anish S Shah, Treena I Burgess, Kirsty L Bayliss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sumitra SahaCentre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, and School of Agricultural Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-4746
Anish S ShahCentre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, and School of Agricultural Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
Treena I BurgessHarry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7962-219X
Kirsty L BaylissCentre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, and School of Agricultural Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-3389

Funding

Hort Innovation AS19004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria that colonise leaf surfaces and internal tissues benefit potato health and productivity. Whether these bacteria are present across potato cultivars and production fields is unknown. Leaf samples were collected from field-grown potatoes (Imperial Blue, Innovator, Nicola, and Royal Blue) at 12 commercial farms across three production regions in Australia. Epiphytic and endophytic bacteria were analysed by amplicon sequencing. Both cultivar and site influenced the bacterial community composition, with endophytes strongly influenced by cultivar, while epiphytes were less consistent. Site-specific bacteria varied with climate, with limited influence from location. Endophytic bacteria identified across cultivars and sites were a Delftia sp., Acinetobacter sp., and Caldalkalibacillus thermarum. The same Delftia sp. and C. thermarum were also cultivar-specific core endophytes in cvs. Imperial Blue, Innovator, and Royal Blue. A Pantoea sp. was the only core epiphyte. The relative abundance of reproducible core taxa was not significantly different between cultivars. The Delftia sp. was the only putative keystone taxon in both endophyte and epiphyte communities in multiple cultivars. The results suggest that potato leaf bacterial communities are influenced by cultivar and site, but also have a shared core. These findings support isolation and further investigation of the roles of core bacterial taxa in potatoes.

Indexed as

BacteriaEndophytesPlant LeavesSolanum tuberosumAustraliaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Senvironmentgenotypemicrobial ecologyputative keystone

Identifiers

PMID42880829
PMCPMC13671851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.