ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Japanese-Style Dietary Patterns, Mortality, and Selected Cancer Outcomes in Japanese Populations: A Systematic Review Integrating Meta-Analysis, Food-Group Loading Visualization, and Qualitative Synthesis.
Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Japanese-style dietary patterns (DPs) are often regarded as healthy, but the food-group combinations needed to develop health-oriented Japanese-style DPs remain unclear. This systematic review synthesized associations between predefined (a priori) Japanese-style DPs and health outcomes in Japanese populations and used data-derived (a posteriori) DPs to examine outcome-specific heterogeneity in food-group composition and loadings. PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science Core Collection were searched for observational studies. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for comparable a priori Japanese-style DPs using adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) comparing the highest and lowest score categories. A posteriori DPs derived by principal component analysis or factor analysis were visualized using reported estimates, investigator-assigned pattern names, relative similarity to the Japanese Diet Index-9 (JDI-9) reference profile, and food-group loadings. Of 37 reports retained in the review, 12 longitudinal reports contributed to meta-analyses or food-group loading visualizations, and 25 were synthesized qualitatively. Across 3 independent studies contributing 5 analytic estimates per outcome, pooled HRs comparing the highest and lowest score categories suggested lower all-cause mortality [HR: 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83, 0.93; I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.