ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
The Sustainability Paradox in Digital Behavior Change Interventions: Narrative Ownership as a Design Principle for Lasting Change.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs), including smartphone apps, wearable devices, and AI-driven adaptive systems, have become a dominant approach for promoting changes in health-related behavior. Although meta-analyses have consistently demonstrated short-term effectiveness, a recurring finding is that these effects are attenuated once user engagement declines or the intervention ends. We describe this phenomenon as the sustainability paradox: the same design features that maximize behavioral success during use, such as automated guidance, real-time feedback, and gamified rewards, may undermine the conditions necessary for the behavior to persist once the intervention is terminated. This viewpoint introduces narrative ownership as a conceptual framework for understanding and addressing this paradox. Narrative ownership refers to the extent to which individuals experience behavior change as an ongoing, interpretable, and self-authored process and comprises 3 components: process framing, narrative repair, and authorship. We argue that many contemporary DBCI architectures unintentionally displace these experiential processes by automating lapse correction, redirecting behaviors without interpretation, and externalizing the attribution of success. We map these tendencies onto 3 structural mechanisms-the erosion of process framing, the foreclosure of narrative repair, and the hollowing of authorship-and distinguish narrative ownership from adjacent constructs such as engagement, self-efficacy, and autonomy support. We also note that narrative ownership is double-edged: the same reflective processes can consolidate negative self-attributions, and its expression varies across cultural contexts, taking a familial or communal rather than strictly individual form in relational settings. Therefore, to translate this framework into practice, we outline 3 design principles for sustainable digital interventions: reflective pauses that support process framing, lapse reinterpretation features that enable narrative repair, and meaning-linking interfaces that strengthen authorship. For each principle, we derive testable propositions-for example, that reflective pauses will improve behavioral maintenance after the intervention ends and that meaning-linking interfaces will sustain behavior after app use is discontinued-along with candidate outcome measures and directions for empirical validation. Together, these principles reposition the user not merely as the recipient of behavioral guidance but also as the author of their own story of change in digital health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.