Observational studyDental press journal of orthodontics2026
Legal vulnerability of orthodontists in professional practice: a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn Brazil, the population's easy access to the judicial system exposes healthcare professionals, including orthodontists, to the risk of becoming involved in legal disputes for which they are often inadequately prepared.
objectiveIn this context, the aim of this study was to assess the legal vulnerability of professionals involved in orthodontic practice and to identify factors associated with professional practice. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis cross-sectional observational study was conducted using a previously validated questionnaire administered to 247 professionals engaged in orthodontic practice. Participants were classified into low, moderate, and high levels of legal vulnerability. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.
resultsThe results indicated greater vulnerability among non-specialists, professionals with fewer years since graduation and shorter clinical experience, as well as among those who graduated from private institutions (p < 0.001). In addition, 72.8% of participants believed that patients' economic status may influence the occurrence of legal claims, and 53.5% reported lacking legal guidance for drafting contracts in their professional practice.
conclusionThe findings suggest the presence of vulnerabilities related to legal knowledge and professional practices, particularly among less experienced professionals and non-specialists in Orthodontics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.