ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluation of a novel body temperature sensor (CORE) in dogs under general anesthesia following premedication with dexmedetomidine or acepromazine: A pilot study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Core body temperature monitoring in anesthetized dogs is a vital part of physiological evaluation. Depending on the procedure and patient positioning, consistent core temperature measurements can be difficult to obtain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and clinical validity of a wireless, non-invasive, superficial heat flux-based thermometric device (CORE, greenTEG AG, Rümlang, Switzerland). Three healthy beagle dogs were premedicated with either dexmedetomidine or acepromazine prior to induction with intravenous propofol and isoflurane maintenance. They were monitored every five minutes with pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood pressure, electrocardiography, and capnometry. Rectal thermometry and temperatures from the CORE sensor placed on clipped and unclipped skin over the jugular veins were measured every three minutes for up to 120 minutes following induction. Based on the correlation coefficient for repeated measures (rrm) and the Shrout-Fleiss intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), in dogs administered acepromazine, there was good, statistically significant correlation and reliability between rectal and clipped CORE temperatures (rrm = 0.81, P < 0.0001; ICC = 0.78) and rectal and unclipped CORE temperatures (rrm = 0.79, P < 0.0001; ICC = 0.85). In dogs administered dexmedetomidine, although values were correlated (rrm = 0.30, P < 0.0001), there was poor reliability (ICC = 0.28) between rectal and clipped CORE temperatures which improved if dogs were unclipped (rrm = 0.48, P < 0.0001; ICC = 0.88). Clinically acceptable Bland-Altman agreements were found between rectal and unclipped CORE methods. These preliminary results suggest that the CORE sensor may provide an alternative method for assessing core body temperatures in unclipped, anesthetized dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.