Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42879439›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Sickle cell disease screening: Experiences of parents with positive newborns at Korle Bu TeachingHospital.

Irene Kanyoke, Faustina Hayford Blankson, Diana Dwuma-Badu, Catherine Segbefia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irene KanyokeDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Faustina Hayford BlanksonDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8012-4098
Diana Dwuma-BaduDepartment of Child Health, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Catherine SegbefiaDepartment of Child Health, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore parents experiences following receipt of positive newborn screening for sickle cell disease (SCD) test results at a teaching hospital in Ghana.

methodsUsing purposive sampling, data were collected using semi-structured individual guides to interview parents of children attending the Paediatric SCD clinic at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH), a major referral health facility in Ghana. Questions were categorized into 3 main areas: parents' reactions to initial positive results, parents' responses to in-clinic counselling, and parents' attitudes towards follow-up clinic care. The Socio-Ecological Model of Health was used to underpin this study. Interviews were conducted face-to-face either in English or a local dialect (Twi), after which they were transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using NVivo software and Microsoft Word to identify relevant codes, which were then organized into themes and sub-themes.

resultsTwenty-four mothers and one father were interviewed between 2nd November 2021 and 28th January 2022. The ages of their children ranged from 7 months to 3 years 9 months. Seventeen (68%) of the parents were married, 5 (20%) had more than one child enrolled in the clinic, and 10 (40%) reported that they or their partners had SCD. The 7 themes identified were: (i) emotional response after disclosure, (ii) decision to share results, (iii) care and management of newborns at home, (iv) knowledge of genetics of SCD, (v) adherence to routine follow-up, (vi) cost, and (vii) Culture. Positive test results elicited worry, surprise, or shock in the majority, especially those with no previous knowledge of or experience with SCD. Most parents had received counselling and educational information on caring for their positive SCD children at home and the danger signs of SCD. The decision to share test results with others was influenced by fear of stigmatization. While desiring to see their children remain healthy, parents defaulted on clinic visits due to financial difficulties and the COVID-19 pandemic.

conclusionKnowledge of SCD and personal experience influenced parents' reaction to initial positive newborn screening for SCD test results. Culture and Cost were structural barriers to care. There is a need for more education about SCD among the general population and institutions, and there is a need to provide psychological and socioeconomic support for families attending the KBTH clinic.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellNeonatal ScreeningParentsAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleGhanaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospitals, TeachingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID42879439
PMCPMC13671566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.