Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42879433›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Improved YOLOv26-ACearly-ASPPdeep for citrus disease and pest detection.

Huiling Li, Xiaoxia Fang, Yufeng Shu, Yichun Zhan, Jiankai Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huiling LiDongguan Polytechnic, Dongguan, China.
Xiaoxia FangDongguan Polytechnic, Dongguan, China.
Yufeng ShuDongguan Polytechnic, Dongguan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8981-7716
Yichun ZhanDongguan Polytechnic, Dongguan, China.
Jiankai ChenDongguan Polytechnic, Dongguan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study addresses early and accurate detection of citrus diseases and pests under complex orchard conditions, which is essential for timely intervention and yield protection. Existing detectors often struggle with small lesions, subtle early symptoms, and cluttered foliage backgrounds. We propose YOLOv26-ACearly-ASPPdeep, a lightweight one-stage detector that functionally decouples feature enhancement across network depth: AdaptiveConv (ACearly) is embedded in shallow C3k2 blocks to strengthen fine-grained, content-aware filtering before aggressive downsampling, while ASPP-based multi-branch context aggregation (ASPPdeep) is placed in deep backbone/neck stages to enlarge receptive-field diversity for irregular lesion morphology. SCDown modules further reduce information loss during downsampling. Experiments on a Roboflow citrus disease/pest dataset (4,358 images; blackspot, canker, greening, and healthy) show that the proposed model improves max precision from 0.75565 (baseline YOLOv26) to 0.78032 (+3.26%) and raises mean Average Precision at IoU = 0.5 (mAP@0.5) from 0.791 to 0.863. Under identical training settings, it also outperforms representative detectors including YOLOv5n, YOLOv7-tiny, YOLOv8n, and YOLOv11n in Precision, Recall, F1-score, and per-class AP, while remaining suitable for near real-time orchard monitoring (15.1 ms/image on an RTX 3090). The results indicate that depth-aware AdaptiveConv-ASPP coupling provides a practical accuracy-efficiency trade-off for smart citrus disease and pest surveillance.

Indexed as

CitrusImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPlant DiseasesAlgorithmsAnimalsDetection Algorithms

Identifiers

PMID42879433
PMCPMC13671518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.