Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42879382›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Evaluating the association between household water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) and selected placenta-related complications in The Gambia, Kenya and Mozambique.

Joseph Wells, Joseph Waiswa, Anifa Vala, Bahtisen Golla, Grace Mwashigadi, Hawanatu Jah, Marleen Temmerman, Robin Okello, Isaac Mwaniki, Herminio Cossa and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Joseph WellsDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1660-8681
Joseph WaiswaCentre for Maternal, Reproductive, Adolescent and Child Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Anifa ValaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Manhiça, Mozambique.
Bahtisen GollaCentre for Maternal, Reproductive, Adolescent and Child Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Grace MwashigadiCentre of Excellence in Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Hawanatu JahMRC Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4347-5247
Marleen TemmermanCentre of Excellence in Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Robin OkelloCentre of Excellence in Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Isaac MwanikiCentre of Excellence in Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1299-1657
Herminio CossaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Manhiça, Mozambique.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5771-2637
Moses MukhanyaCentre of Excellence in Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Esperança SeveneCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Manhiça, Mozambique.
Yahaya IdrisMRC Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0228-1017
Onesmus WanjeCentre of Excellence in Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0271-2533
Angela KoechCentre of Excellence in Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Anna RocaMRC Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Laura BraunDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Marie-Laure VolvertDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fatima TourayMRC Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2384-4970
Umberto D'AlessandroMRC Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Wendy GrahamDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-5342
Hannah BlencoweCentre for Maternal, Reproductive, Adolescent and Child Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-3159
PRECISE and PRECISE-DYAD Networks

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Placenta-related complications contribute substantially to maternal and perinatal mortality globally, with the greatest burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the potential influence of inadequate household water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) on these outcomes remains poorly characterised. We investigated associations between household WASH conditions and selected placenta-related complications, including pre-eclampsia, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and stillbirth, in The Gambia, Kenya and Mozambique. This secondary analysis was nested within PRECISE (PREgnancy Care Integrating Translational Science, Everywhere), a prospective observational cohort of 5,745 unselected pregnant women. Multivariable modified Poisson regression with robust standard errors was used to assess associations between household WASH exposures and pre-eclampsia, SGA or stillbirth. Missing exposure and covariate data were low (<5%) and handled using multiple imputation. Compared with water piped into the dwelling or plot, other improved water sources (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.31, p = 0.002) and unimproved water sources (aRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00-1.50, p = 0.049) were associated with a higher risk of any selected placenta-related complication. Unimproved sanitation facilities, compared with improved facilities, were also associated with increased risk (aRR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.30, p = 0.019). The findings suggest that household‑level WASH conditions may be associated with selected placenta‑related complications through both direct and indirect pathways. Water sources, whether unimproved or improved, may be contaminated, and collection, transport, and storage further increase contamination risks while adding a physical burden to water collectors. Unsafe sanitation may also increase exposure to enteric pathogens. Given the observed associations, targeted WASH interventions warrant investigation as a potential strategy to reduce placenta-related complications and improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes in LMICs. Future research should explore the mechanisms linking WASH to pre-eclampsia, SGA, stillbirth and other placenta-related complications, and assess the effect of comprehensive WASH interventions.

Identifiers

PMID42879382
PMCPMC13671507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.