ArticlePLoS medicine2026
Associations of food processing and dietary risk factors with colorectal cancer incidence in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study: A cohort study.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltra-processed foods (UPF) account for >50% of energy intake by US adults. UPF intake can include dietary components linked to lower colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, such as whole grain and dairy products, and others linked to higher CRC risk, such as processed meats, potentially explaining the heterogeneity of evidence for an association between UPF and CRC risk. Our goal was to estimate the associations of UPF and established CRC-related dietary factors, by UPF and non-UPF source, with CRC incidence in a large cohort study. METHODS AND
findingsUS adults, aged 50-71, who enrolled in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study in 1995-96, self-reported dietary intake using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Median UPF intake was 293 g/1000 kcal/day or 43% of daily energy intake. We assigned disaggregated FFQ items to Nova classification and categorized UPF intake (g/1000 kcal/day) into sex-specific quintiles. Participants who were cancer-free at baseline (N = 461,682) were followed for cancer incidence through 2018, and 10,075 colorectal adenocarcinoma cases were diagnosed. We used multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and health-related factors, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol drinking, to estimate associations for UPF and related dietary components with CRC incidence. UPF intake was not associated with CRC incidence (hazard ratio 5th versus 1st quintile 0.97; 95% confidence interval [0.91-1.03]; ptrend = 0.55). Whole grain, fiber, dairy, and calcium intakes from UPF sources were inversely but meat intake from UPF sources was positively associated with CRC incidence. The main limitations of the study relate to its observational design and include potential residual confounding and exposure misclassification owing to systematic or random error in self-reported dietary data.
conclusionsTotal UPF intake was not associated with incident CRC in this cohort of older, US adults. This may be explained, in part, by opposing associations of some UPF with CRC risk. Our findings support current dietary guidance to consume whole grains, fiber, dairy, and calcium and avoid processed meat for CRC prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.