ArticleEuropean stroke journal2026
Endovascular thrombectomy activity as a candidate marker of organised acute stroke-service capacity: a global burden of disease-based European panel study.
Article in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute stroke-care organisation might contribute to variation in ischaemic stroke outcomes across Europe. We assessed whether national endovascular thrombectomy activity was associated with Global Burden of Disease-derived ischaemic stroke burden across European and adjacent countries. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe conducted a repeated cross-sectional ecological analysis of a balanced three-wave panel of 39 countries (2016, 2019 and 2020) using a consistent thrombectomy data source. The primary outcome was the ischaemic stroke mortality-to-incidence ratio. We used a within-between model with wave fixed effects, adjusted for Socio-Demographic Index and population aged 65 years or older.
resultsBetween countries, higher thrombectomy activity was associated with a lower mortality-to-incidence ratio (fully standardised β = -0.42, 95% confidence interval -0.79 to -0.05; P = .027), whereas no within-country association was detected (β = +0.10, -0.07 to +0.26). The between-country estimate attenuated after joint adjustment for health expenditure and Universal Health Coverage (β = -0.28; P = .051) and after adjustment for stroke incidence (β = -0.33; P = .061). In leave-one-country-out analyses, P values ranged from .007 to .061. DISCUSSION: The between-country estimate is more vulnerable to unmeasured national differences and could not be separated from health-system resources. This ecological study cannot estimate the causal effect of increasing thrombectomy provision.
conclusionNational thrombectomy activity distinguished countries with lower ischaemic stroke mortality relative to incidence but did not track within-country change. It remains a candidate marker for cross-country comparison, not an established indicator for monitoring change, and should be interpreted alongside directly measured quality-of-care indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.