Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42879104›Full record

ReviewScience China. Life sciences2026

Current understanding and new promises of umbilical cord blood in emerging clinical applications.

Xinyu Feng, Yuxuan Liu, Sha Hao, Tao Cheng, Linping Hu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Science China. Life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinyu Feng *State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300020, China.
Yuxuan Liu *State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300020, China.
Sha HaoState Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300020, China. haosha@ihcams.ac.cn.
Tao ChengState Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300020, China. chengtao@ihcams.ac.cn.
Linping HuState Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300020, China. hulinping@ihcams.ac.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) has become an important resource for regenerative medicine owing to its unique cellular composition, immune immaturity, and abundance of bioactive factors. Although UCB was initially applied in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, accumulating evidence indicates that its diverse cellular and paracrine components possess broad regenerative potential. Beyond conventional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, substantial progress has expanded the therapeutic scope of UCB to immune cell-based therapies, the treatment of genetic and metabolic disorders, and tissue repair. In this review, we focus on the biological characteristics of the key cellular and noncellular components of UCB and analyze how these properties support tissue repair, immunomodulation, and regeneration across multiple organ systems. We further summarize recent technological advances, including cell engineering, gene modification, and manufacturing technologies, that have enhanced the scalability and therapeutic potential of UCB-derived products. In addition, we highlight current challenges that limit their widespread clinical application. This review aims to provide a framework for optimizing UCB-based therapies and accelerating their clinical translation. Optimizing UCB collection, processing, and application strategies may further unlock its therapeutic potential, thereby improving clinical efficacy and expanding its applicability to a broader range of diseases.

Indexed as

cell therapyclinical applicationsgene editinghematopoietic stem cellimmune cellregenerative medicineumbilical cord blood

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.