ReviewScience China. Life sciences2026
Current understanding and new promises of umbilical cord blood in emerging clinical applications.
Review in Science China. Life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Umbilical cord blood (UCB) has become an important resource for regenerative medicine owing to its unique cellular composition, immune immaturity, and abundance of bioactive factors. Although UCB was initially applied in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, accumulating evidence indicates that its diverse cellular and paracrine components possess broad regenerative potential. Beyond conventional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, substantial progress has expanded the therapeutic scope of UCB to immune cell-based therapies, the treatment of genetic and metabolic disorders, and tissue repair. In this review, we focus on the biological characteristics of the key cellular and noncellular components of UCB and analyze how these properties support tissue repair, immunomodulation, and regeneration across multiple organ systems. We further summarize recent technological advances, including cell engineering, gene modification, and manufacturing technologies, that have enhanced the scalability and therapeutic potential of UCB-derived products. In addition, we highlight current challenges that limit their widespread clinical application. This review aims to provide a framework for optimizing UCB-based therapies and accelerating their clinical translation. Optimizing UCB collection, processing, and application strategies may further unlock its therapeutic potential, thereby improving clinical efficacy and expanding its applicability to a broader range of diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42879104What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.