ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Battling the Bottleneck: Evaluating Autism Diagnostic Training in Primary Care.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe study purpose was to implement and evaluate the STAT™ (Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers & Young Children 24-36 months old) for primary care providers (PCPs) in a Wisconsin, USA, cohort. It examined the impacts of the training and learning community on knowledge, attitudes, and change in self-reported provider confidence in autism diagnosis.
methodsThis study evaluated the implementation of a developmental assessment training program, for PCPs, using the STAT, followed by a year-long autism learning community involving monthly case-based discussions and knowledge exchange. English-speaking PCPs were assessed pre- and post-training on knowledge, screening and diagnostic practices, attitudes toward autism diagnosis in primary care, and comfort with autism identification and management. Descriptive statistics summarized baseline characteristics and practices. Paired-samples t-tests were used to evaluate pre- to post-training changes in provider comfort.
resultsBaseline findings (n=23) PCPs indicated limited use of autism-specific screening and diagnostic tools among PCPs. Among PCPs with matched pre- and post-training data (n = 11), significant improvements were observed across multiple domains of provider comfort identifying autism risk, distinguishing autism from other developmental conditions, making formal diagnoses, and providing diagnostic feedback. Improvements in care coordination domains, such as referral practices and mental health service linkage, were more limited.
conclusionsSTAT training was associated with meaningful improvements in provider confidence, particularly in autism identification and diagnostic decision-making within primary care settings. Training PCPs to diagnose autism in young children with obvious signs, has the potential to reduce diagnostic delays and improve access to early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42879056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.